Forum

Notifications
Clear all

The director's role in the budget

8 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
718 Views
(@spokane36)
Posts: 69
Estimable Member
Topic starter
 

I'm interested in knowing what the director's role in the budget is and how much it takes. Anybody been there who knows?

 
Posted : 21/10/2008 7:24 pm
(@certified-instigator)
Posts: 2951
Famed Member
 

I have done over a hundred budgets. I'm not sure what you're
asking. How much does what take?

The director is (typically) hired after the budget is made so the
director of a movie as no role in the budget.

=============================================
The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but progress.
Joseph Joubert, essayist (1754-1824)

=============================================
The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but progress.
Joseph Joubert, essayist (1754-1824)

 
Posted : 21/10/2008 9:07 pm
(@spokane36)
Posts: 69
Estimable Member
Topic starter
 

I know. I just had a hard time describing what I meant. What I think I meant to say was how limited is the director with his choices when it comes to budget. How much does the director make decisions based on budgets? Could the budget effect the directors intentions? Does the director have to make a lot of choices based on budget? etc. etc. etc.

 
Posted : 21/10/2008 9:44 pm
(@certified-instigator)
Posts: 2951
Famed Member
 

It depends on the project. And the clout and experience of the director.

The budget always effects the directors intentions. There are probably five or six
directors who get everything they want. And I bet there are none who get everything
they want every time.

In general the director has very little say on the budget and there are always compromises
and choices and decisions that must be made on a movie project.

=============================================
The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but progress.
Joseph Joubert, essayist (1754-1824)

 
Posted : 21/10/2008 11:49 pm
(@own3dstudios)
Posts: 217
Reputable Member
 

i belive that the budget definitly effects the director's intentions. Honestly, like certified said, there arent many directers that have complete free range, and not many get to call the shots with budget (no pun intended) ;?

"They say a picture is worth a thousand words. But a film? Well, thats worth a thousand pictures."
-(Own3d Studios)-
www.own3dstudios.com
www.myspace.com/own3dstudio
www.youtube.com/own3dstudios

"They say a picture is worth a thousand words. But a film? Well, thats worth a thousand pictures."-(Own3d Studios)-
www.own3dstudios.com

 
Posted : 24/10/2008 3:41 pm
(@rjschwarz)
Posts: 1814
Noble Member
 

I would say the directors that do have free range have that because they have already proven they are somewhat responsible budget-wise.

RJSchwarz
San Diego, CA

RJSchwarz

 
Posted : 24/10/2008 6:38 pm
(@davidscjr)
Posts: 56
Trusted Member
 

It also depends if the director is also on-board as a producer level member of the film. Being part of the team that decides where the money will go. It's obviously easier to move money from post production into production if you're involved in the financial aspect of the production.

David

David Schatanoff
D Studios Productions

David Schatanoff
D Studios Productions

 
Posted : 26/10/2008 1:59 am
(@scott)
Posts: 7
Active Member
 

I agree with David. Directors who also play the role of a producer are involved with the budget. Otherwise, it's after the fact and they have to work with whatever money has been allocated for the film.

--------
http://www.greattalents.com/profile/162/_/default.aspx

--------
http://www.greattalents.com/profile/162/_/default.aspx

 
Posted : 06/11/2008 5:35 am
Share: