Take for instance a typical consumer camcorder, like sony's HDR-SR1, which is handheld and small, and something like the Sony HDR-FX7, which looks more like traditional movie camera's. Both claim a multitude of features and high quality Hi-Def video, so why are they so different in size?
Often times, you'll find that on the smaller, hand-held cameras, all the advanced features will be found in on-screen menus and such. The larger cameras usually have more features as physical buttons and dials on the camera body itself, for ease of access.
'In the life that man creates for himself, he too, creates his demise... and his legacy.'
'In the life that man creates for himself, he too, creates his demise... and his legacy.'
also bigger cameras usually mean bigger lenses... which means higher quality of lens... which means better picture...
www.maketradefair.com
www.thehungersite.com
www.oxfam.ca
www.maketradefair.com
www.thehungersite.com
www.oxfam.ca
One consideration is if you intend any kind of guerrilla filmmaking, the small camera looks touristy, while the large one may draw police asking for permits. Just an aside but for some people that might be a consideration.
RJSchwarz
San Diego, CA
RJSchwarz
If its in your price range you might want to consider buying a Canon Xl-1s or an XL2 used. Both are 'reasonably' priced, but they have interchangeable lenses and are compatable with lots of professional equipment. Another reason they are a good investment is if you decide you want a much nicer camera or want to give up film making together, you can sell them on ebay for nearly what you payed.
